Math and science::Analysis::Tao::07. Series
The comparison test (and bounded series of non-negative numbers)
We wish to extend the comparison test for finite series to apply to infinite
series.
For finite series, the comparison test appeared as a simple
opening lemma (7.1.4 f):
For infinite series, we
can only make this statement when , otherwise the sum
for could diverge. We set this up and prove it below.
First, a
useful (and very simple) proposition.
Sums of non-negative numbers are
bounded iff they are convergent.
Let be a
formal series of non-negative real numbers. Then this series is convergent if
and only if there is a real number such that
Proof
Two earlier propositions are:
- Every
convergent sequence of real numbers is bounded (6.1.17).
- An
increasing sequence which has an upper bound is convergent (6.3.8).
The sequence representing the series is increasing, by definition. So the above two
propositions form each side of the proposition's iff statement.
Now
we can introduce the comparison test.
Comparison test
Let and be two formal series
of real numbers, and suppose that for all (thus all numbers in must be non-negative).
Then if is convergent, then is absolutely convergent, and in fact
Proof
Let be the Nth partial sum of and be the Nth partial sum of .
As is bounded according to the proposition above, and by the the comparison test for finite series we have:
Through this transitivity, also meets the conditions for being bounded. Then from the above propositive again, it must be that is convergent.
The Absolute Convergence Test informs us that absolute convergence implies conditional convergence, and in addition that .
Thus, with all of the below infinite series converging we can compare them like so:
We can also run the Comparison Test in the contrapositive:
If is not absolutely convergent then is not conditionally convergent.
Source
p171