header
Show Answer
Math and science::Analysis::Tao, measure::02. Lebesgue measure

Outer regularity. Theorem.

This property connects the outer Lebesgue measure of an arbitrary set ERd to the outer Lebesgue measure of open sets which contain E.

Outer regularity. Theorem.

Let ERd be an arbitrary set. Then one has:

[m(E)=infover what?m(U). ]

The prove is illustrative of the ε2n trick.

Proof

From monotonicity of outer Lebesgue measure, we have:

[m(E)something. ]

So we are left to show the reverse:

[somethingm(E).]

Reading this second less-equal as "not greater than" can motivate intuition.

Tao points out specifically that the inequality is trivial if m(E) is infinite, and we can assume that m(E) is finite.

What follows is a exemplary use of the ε2n trick.

Let ε>0 be a real. The definition of outer Lebesgue measure affords us the ability to assert the existance of a countable family of boxes covering E such that it's outer measure is slightly greater than the infimum:

i=1|Bi|m(E)+ε

We can enlarge each box Bi to become an open box Bi such that |Bi||Bi|+ε2i. The union of these open boxes is also open and also contains E. In particular, we have:

[i=1|Bi|m(E)+ε+i=1ε2i=m(E)+what?]

Applying subadditivity (the outer measure of the union is less than the sum of the outer measures) we have:

m(i=1Bi)m(E)+2ε.

Denote this union as B=i=1Bi. We have found an open set B that contains E and has outer measure m(B)m(E)+2ε. The infimum of measure over open covers of E must be less than this one instance of an open cover:

infEU,Uis openm(U)m(B)m(E)+2ε.

As ε was arbitrary, we have:

[infEU,Uis openm(U)?m(E),]
and combined with our initial subadditivity claim, we have:
infEU,Uis openm(U)=m(E).