\( \newcommand{\matr}[1] {\mathbf{#1}} \newcommand{\vertbar} {\rule[-1ex]{0.5pt}{2.5ex}} \newcommand{\horzbar} {\rule[.5ex]{2.5ex}{0.5pt}} \)
Show Answer
\( \newcommand{\cat}[1] {\mathrm{#1}} \newcommand{\catobj}[1] {\operatorname{Obj}(\mathrm{#1})} \newcommand{\cathom}[1] {\operatorname{Hom}_{\cat{#1}}} \)
Math and science::Topology


Compact sets can be thought of as a generalization of [what?]. See the reverse side for a justification.

There are multiple ways of formulating compactness, with some being more intuitive than others. 

There are 3 formulations that are particularly important.

1. Compactness, in terms of sequences in \( \mathbb{R} \).

A set \( K \subset \mathbb{R} \) is compact iff [what?].

What is the topological generalization of this definition?

The most basic example of such a closed set in \( \mathbb{R} \) is [a what?].

Bolzano-Weierstrass's theorem connects the first and second formulations.

2. Compactness, in terms of [something], [something] sets.

A set \( K \subset \mathbb{R}^n \) is compact iff it is [what and what?].

The next formulation is the most general of the three, graduating to the topic of topology. It uses the idea of a cover and a subcover.


Let \( X \) be a topological space. A cover of \( X \) is a family \( (U_i)_{i \in I} \) of subsets of \( X \) such that [...]. It is finite iff the indexing set \( I \) is finite, and open iff \( U_i \) is open for each \( i \in I \).

Given a cover \( (U_i)_{i \in I} \) and \( J \subseteq I \), we say that [...] is a subcover of \( (U_i)_{i \in I} \) if it is itself a cover of \( X \).

3. Compactness, in terms of covers.

A topological space \( X \) is compact iff [what?].

What is the theorem that connects these three formulations of compactness?